SuperPentest vs Aikido

One platform for everything, or depth on the pentest?

Aikido Security's pitch is consolidation — SAST, SCA, cloud and DAST in one place, with an autonomous pentest module added on. SuperPentest does one job and goes deep: an autonomous AI penetration test for web, API and the AI agents in your product, where every finding is reproduced from a clean session. Here is where each fits, with Aikido details from public materials as of October 2026.

Compare · 24 October 2026Competitor details from public materials

The short version: if your goal is to replace several AppSec tools with one platform, Aikido's all-in-one suite is the draw and its autonomous pentest is a useful addition. If your goal is a deep penetration test — authenticated flows, business logic, the AI agents in your product, every finding reproduced — that specialisation is where SuperPentest focuses. These are different purchases: a suite versus a pentest.

At a glance

CapabilitySuperPentestAikido Security
Autonomous AI pentest✓ (the product)✓ (one module)
All-in-one AppSec (SAST/SCA/cloud)—✓ (focus)
Web & API testing✓✓ (API-focused)
Authenticated testing✓✓
Business logic✓Claimed
AI-agent & prompt-injection testing✓—
Clean-session reproduction✓Validates findings
EU-based / EU hosting✓ Frankfurt✓ Ghent
Published pricing✓ from €3,500✓

Aikido details compiled from public materials, October 2026 — verify current capabilities with the vendor.

Where Aikido is strong

Aikido Security, based in Ghent, is an all-in-one application-security platform that brings SAST, SCA, cloud security and DAST under one roof, with published, accessible pricing and a developer-friendly setup. It added autonomous AI pentesting focused on API security and authenticated routes, discovering endpoints through traffic and testing them with context-aware exploits. For a team that wants to consolidate several tools and reduce vendor sprawl, that breadth is the main attraction.

Where SuperPentest differs

SuperPentest is not a suite — it is a focused penetration test, and the depth shows. It performs authenticated testing as each identity you supply, reasons about business logic, and tests the AI agents inside your product (prompt injection, tool-call boundaries, MCP) — a surface a general AppSec suite typically does not touch. Every candidate is reproduced from a clean session with hash-chained request/response evidence mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, NIS2, DORA and OWASP, and it runs in the EU (Frankfurt). How we verify → · AI-agent testing →

Aikido — AppSec suite SAST SCA Cloud security DAST Pentest — 1 of 5 modules goes deep SuperPentest — dedicated pentest the entire product — taken deep ● Authenticated, as each identity ● Business logic ● AI agents · prompt-injection · MCP ● Clean-session reproduction pentest is the product, not a module
In a suite, the pentest is one module of five — breadth over depth. SuperPentest is a dedicated pentest: the whole product spent on authenticated flows, business logic, the AI agents inside your app, and reproduced evidence.

Which to choose

  • Choose Aikido if your priority is consolidating SAST, SCA, cloud and DAST into one platform with pentesting included.
  • Choose SuperPentest if your priority is a deep, reproduced penetration test and testing the AI in your product.
  • They can coexist: a suite for broad coverage, SuperPentest for the deep pentest and AI-agent testing. See the full field.

FAQ

What is the difference between SuperPentest and Aikido Security?

Aikido is an all-in-one AppSec suite (SAST/SCA/cloud/DAST) with an autonomous pentest module; SuperPentest is a focused autonomous AI pentest for web, API and AI agents, reproducing every finding from a clean session. A suite versus a pentest.

Is SuperPentest an alternative to Aikido's pentesting?

Yes — for deep authenticated, business-logic and AI-agent testing with reproduced evidence. Aikido stays attractive for one-platform SAST/SCA/cloud/DAST. Verify current capabilities with each vendor.

Evaluate SuperPentest. Book a demo or request an evaluation account. See the full comparison.